It is currently Sat May 18, 2013 10:11 am


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 133 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: It's not just us "muppets" Fat Phil...
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 7:59 am 
Immortal
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am

Posts: 26774

Location: In my armchair

H. Pedersen wrote:
thebish wrote:
hmmm... but by that standard you'd have to conclude that every chairman of a club that gets relegated is incompetent - either because they stuck with a manager who wasn't up to the job - OR because they sacked the manager and brought in someone who wasn't up to the job....


Not exactly . . . as I mentioned both Blackburn and Bolton had been in the league for more than 10 years. Both were top 10 not that long ago. A team like Derby comes up, doesn't have the talent or the money to stay up, OK I get it. But something has gone seriously wrong to bring down a team like Bolton or Blackburn.



hmmmm... who do you think we are???? that kind of talk will scare the punters into thinking there's a West Ham fan in our midst!! :wink:

_________________
664 - the neighbour of the beast....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: It's not just us "muppets" Fat Phil...
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 8:55 am 
Immortal
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Posts: 19229

H. Pedersen wrote:
thebish wrote:
hmmm... but by that standard you'd have to conclude that every chairman of a club that gets relegated is incompetent - either because they stuck with a manager who wasn't up to the job - OR because they sacked the manager and brought in someone who wasn't up to the job....


Not exactly . . . as I mentioned both Blackburn and Bolton had been in the league for more than 10 years. Both were top 10 not that long ago. A team like Derby comes up, doesn't have the talent or the money to stay up, OK I get it. But something has gone seriously wrong to bring down a team like Bolton or Blackburn.


You're not taking it in context though. Derby are a similar sized, similar type, and similarly resourced club to ourselves.

When Gartside took over as chairman we were 6th bottom in the championship having spent 2 seasons in the top flight in the last 20 years (on both occasions we'd been relegated immediately). And just over 10 years before had been playing our football in what then was called division 4 and is now referred to as league 2. We had at the time Gartside came in, debts to banks over £40M. As a championship club. We were having to sell players simply to pay the interest on the loans and the manager walked out over this. We didn't own the ground or facilities fully. Simply we were weeks away from going into administration and given the time, nobody knew what that would have meant (there wasn't a precedent back then).

Frankly at the time we had more chance of receeding back to the bottom division than we did of achieving what we did. Gartside brought in Alan Duckworth to sort the finances out. He brought in Sam to work on a much smaller budget that we were previously. We lost in the play off semi finals that year. Then basically half the team was sold to balance the books. The year after we got promotion. Then stayed in the top division back to back for the first time in 20 odd years......

At which point Gartside brought Eddie Davies in to invest in the club, to a greater extent than anyone ever had in the past.

We now owe £10M to banks and have had more than £100M invested from Eddie Davies. We've had our longest spell in the top flight in over half a century, qualified for Europe twice and achieved over a consistent period far more than the history of our club, and clubs of similar sizes would suggest possible. We own the ground, the academy, and some land around the middlebrook. We have seen some fantastic players and have been on an incredible journey.

Do I think we should have gone down this season? No. But we WERE going to go down one season, whether it be the next one, the one after, one in 5 years time.....it was inevitable. Clubs of our size and much bigger will. The top flight has not had very many consistent clubs and those it has are far more resourced than we are.

This season has been a failure. Does it mean that Gartside (who lets remember is chairman, not owner, nor manager) is incompetent and overall has failed?

Absolutely not. The history of this club shows he's been a massive success overall.

I guarantee that we'll miss him (even the ones who make hilariously funny jokes around his name) when he packs it in.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: It's not just us "muppets" Fat Phil...
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 8:58 am 
Icon

Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 3:08 pm

Posts: 4962

BWFC_Insane wrote:
H. Pedersen wrote:
thebish wrote:
hmmm... but by that standard you'd have to conclude that every chairman of a club that gets relegated is incompetent - either because they stuck with a manager who wasn't up to the job - OR because they sacked the manager and brought in someone who wasn't up to the job....


Not exactly . . . as I mentioned both Blackburn and Bolton had been in the league for more than 10 years. Both were top 10 not that long ago. A team like Derby comes up, doesn't have the talent or the money to stay up, OK I get it. But something has gone seriously wrong to bring down a team like Bolton or Blackburn.


You're not taking it in context though. Derby are a similar sized, similar type, and similarly resourced club to ourselves.

When Gartside took over as chairman we were 6th bottom in the championship having spent 2 seasons in the top flight in the last 20 years (on both occasions we'd been relegated immediately). And just over 10 years before had been playing our football in what then was called division 4 and is now referred to as league 2. We had at the time Gartside came in, debts to banks over £40M. As a championship club. We were having to sell players simply to pay the interest on the loans and the manager walked out over this. We didn't own the ground or facilities fully. Simply we were weeks away from going into administration and given the time, nobody knew what that would have meant (there wasn't a precedent back then).

Frankly at the time we had more chance of receeding back to the bottom division than we did of achieving what we did. Gartside brought in Alan Duckworth to sort the finances out. He brought in Sam to work on a much smaller budget that we were previously. We lost in the play off semi finals that year. Then basically half the team was sold to balance the books. The year after we got promotion. Then stayed in the top division back to back for the first time in 20 odd years......

At which point Gartside brought Eddie Davies in to invest in the club, to a greater extent than anyone ever had in the past.

We now owe £10M to banks and have had more than £100M invested from Eddie Davies. We've had our longest spell in the top flight in over half a century, qualified for Europe twice and achieved over a consistent period far more than the history of our club, and clubs of similar sizes would suggest possible. We own the ground, the academy, and some land around the middlebrook. We have seen some fantastic players and have been on an incredible journey.

Do I think we should have gone down this season? No. But we WERE going to go down one season, whether it be the next one, the one after, one in 5 years time.....it was inevitable. Clubs of our size and much bigger will. The top flight has not had very many consistent clubs and those it has are far more resourced than we are.

This season has been a failure. Does it mean that Gartside (who lets remember is chairman, not owner, nor manager) is incompetent and overall has failed?

Absolutely not. The history of this club shows he's been a massive success overall.

I guarantee that we'll miss him (even the ones who make hilariously funny jokes around his name) when he packs it in.



Erm, this. With nobs on.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: It's not just us "muppets" Fat Phil...
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 9:01 am 
Icon
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:13 am

Posts: 5262

Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)

Yeh but Jay-Jay's still pissed off.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: It's not just us "muppets" Fat Phil...
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 9:03 am 
Immortal
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Posts: 13159

Location: Ellenbrook

BWFCI :pray: :pray:

_________________
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

http://www.twitter.com/Neilturner83
http://www.worsleytownfc.co.uk
http://www.twitter.com/worsleytownfc


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: It's not just us "muppets" Fat Phil...
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 10:48 am 
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:19 pm

Posts: 6154

Location: Simon Farnworth's glove bag

Gary the Enfield wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
H. Pedersen wrote:
thebish wrote:
hmmm... but by that standard you'd have to conclude that every chairman of a club that gets relegated is incompetent - either because they stuck with a manager who wasn't up to the job - OR because they sacked the manager and brought in someone who wasn't up to the job....


Not exactly . . . as I mentioned both Blackburn and Bolton had been in the league for more than 10 years. Both were top 10 not that long ago. A team like Derby comes up, doesn't have the talent or the money to stay up, OK I get it. But something has gone seriously wrong to bring down a team like Bolton or Blackburn.


You're not taking it in context though. Derby are a similar sized, similar type, and similarly resourced club to ourselves.

When Gartside took over as chairman we were 6th bottom in the championship having spent 2 seasons in the top flight in the last 20 years (on both occasions we'd been relegated immediately). And just over 10 years before had been playing our football in what then was called division 4 and is now referred to as league 2. We had at the time Gartside came in, debts to banks over £40M. As a championship club. We were having to sell players simply to pay the interest on the loans and the manager walked out over this. We didn't own the ground or facilities fully. Simply we were weeks away from going into administration and given the time, nobody knew what that would have meant (there wasn't a precedent back then).

Frankly at the time we had more chance of receeding back to the bottom division than we did of achieving what we did. Gartside brought in Alan Duckworth to sort the finances out. He brought in Sam to work on a much smaller budget that we were previously. We lost in the play off semi finals that year. Then basically half the team was sold to balance the books. The year after we got promotion. Then stayed in the top division back to back for the first time in 20 odd years......

At which point Gartside brought Eddie Davies in to invest in the club, to a greater extent than anyone ever had in the past.

We now owe £10M to banks and have had more than £100M invested from Eddie Davies. We've had our longest spell in the top flight in over half a century, qualified for Europe twice and achieved over a consistent period far more than the history of our club, and clubs of similar sizes would suggest possible. We own the ground, the academy, and some land around the middlebrook. We have seen some fantastic players and have been on an incredible journey.

Do I think we should have gone down this season? No. But we WERE going to go down one season, whether it be the next one, the one after, one in 5 years time.....it was inevitable. Clubs of our size and much bigger will. The top flight has not had very many consistent clubs and those it has are far more resourced than we are.

This season has been a failure. Does it mean that Gartside (who lets remember is chairman, not owner, nor manager) is incompetent and overall has failed?

Absolutely not. The history of this club shows he's been a massive success overall.

I guarantee that we'll miss him (even the ones who make hilariously funny jokes around his name) when he packs it in.



Erm, this. With nobs on.


and bells

_________________
"There were plenty of fellas who would kick your b*ll**ks off, the difference was that at the end they'd shake your hand and help you look for them."

Nathaniel Lofthouse(27 August 1925 – 15 January 2011)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: It's not just us "muppets" Fat Phil...
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 10:52 am 
Icon
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm

Posts: 4131

and dangly bits.

_________________
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: It's not just us "muppets" Fat Phil...
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 12:10 pm 
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:19 pm

Posts: 6154

Location: Simon Farnworth's glove bag

and a side order of onion rings

_________________
"There were plenty of fellas who would kick your b*ll**ks off, the difference was that at the end they'd shake your hand and help you look for them."

Nathaniel Lofthouse(27 August 1925 – 15 January 2011)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: It's not just us "muppets" Fat Phil...
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 12:14 pm 
Dedicated

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:17 am

Posts: 1768

TKIZ! wrote:
and a side order of onion rings



And a blowjob in the alley behind Burger King.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: It's not just us "muppets" Fat Phil...
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 12:21 pm 
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:19 pm

Posts: 6154

Location: Simon Farnworth's glove bag

:)

_________________
"There were plenty of fellas who would kick your b*ll**ks off, the difference was that at the end they'd shake your hand and help you look for them."

Nathaniel Lofthouse(27 August 1925 – 15 January 2011)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: It's not just us "muppets" Fat Phil...
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 1:04 pm 
Dedicated
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 1:26 pm

Posts: 1925

Location: North London, originally Farnworth

And whistles. 8)

_________________
Don't try to be a great man. Just be a man and let history make up its own mind.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: It's not just us "muppets" Fat Phil...
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 1:05 pm 
Dedicated
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 1:26 pm

Posts: 1925

Location: North London, originally Farnworth

Sponge wrote:
TKIZ! wrote:
and a side order of onion rings



And a blowjob in the alley behind Burger King.


Ah! You still doing that, Sponge? :lol:

_________________
Don't try to be a great man. Just be a man and let history make up its own mind.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: It's not just us "muppets" Fat Phil...
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 1:13 pm 
Icon
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:13 am

Posts: 5262

Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)

He cant answer you, he's got his mouth full...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: It's not just us "muppets" Fat Phil...
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 1:14 pm 
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:19 pm

Posts: 6154

Location: Simon Farnworth's glove bag

Shouldn't talk with your mouth full, eh Sponge?

_________________
"There were plenty of fellas who would kick your b*ll**ks off, the difference was that at the end they'd shake your hand and help you look for them."

Nathaniel Lofthouse(27 August 1925 – 15 January 2011)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: It's not just us "muppets" Fat Phil...
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 1:25 pm 
Dedicated

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:17 am

Posts: 1768

Gravedigger wrote:
Sponge wrote:
TKIZ! wrote:
and a side order of onion rings



And a blowjob in the alley behind Burger King.


Ah! You still doing that, Sponge? :lol:





You know my price.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: It's not just us "muppets" Fat Phil...
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 1:26 pm 
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:19 pm

Posts: 6154

Location: Simon Farnworth's glove bag

BAZINGA!

_________________
"There were plenty of fellas who would kick your b*ll**ks off, the difference was that at the end they'd shake your hand and help you look for them."

Nathaniel Lofthouse(27 August 1925 – 15 January 2011)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: It's not just us "muppets" Fat Phil...
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 1:59 pm 
Immortal
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am

Posts: 26774

Location: In my armchair

Sponge wrote:
TKIZ! wrote:
and a side order of onion rings



And a blowjob in the alley behind Burger King.



hmmm... where to hang those onion rings...

_________________
664 - the neighbour of the beast....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: It's not just us "muppets" Fat Phil...
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 2:03 pm 
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:19 pm

Posts: 6154

Location: Simon Farnworth's glove bag

thebish wrote:
Sponge wrote:
TKIZ! wrote:
and a side order of onion rings



And a blowjob in the alley behind Burger King.



hmmm... where to hang those onion rings...


We'll let you guess, Bish :lol:

_________________
"There were plenty of fellas who would kick your b*ll**ks off, the difference was that at the end they'd shake your hand and help you look for them."

Nathaniel Lofthouse(27 August 1925 – 15 January 2011)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: It's not just us "muppets" Fat Phil...
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 6:29 pm 
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 5:56 am

Posts: 8680

Location: Seattle, WA, USA

BWFCI, I appreciate what Gartside did for the club in the past but all of that was a decade ago. Since then it’s just been cock-up after cock-up. Carling Cup Final, fax in pocket, Sam’s departure, good things in small packages, Heider Helgusson, people who know football, Johan Elmander, two closed Premier Leagues, Owen Coyle, 4-4-2, Marvin Sordell, and now relegation.

If you don’t want to label him incompetent due to the fact that he was apparently competent 10 years ago, I could understand that. Maybe he’s gone senile?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: It's not just us "muppets" Fat Phil...
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 6:34 pm 
Immortal
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:51 am

Posts: 12107

Anyone who thinks he is incompetent does not know what they are talking about.

That doesn't mean he hasn't made mistakes.

Essentially, what BWFCi says is spot on. Of course in that time there has been individual fiascos such as the Carling Cup final situation, plenty of foot in mouth doh moments (faxes in pockets, won't miss Allardyce coz Sammy Lee is ace, people who know football) and, my personal biggest criticism, the way contracts have been handled with the 'buy young sell big' policy. Still, overall, the positives overwhelm the negatives. From out of business to Europe and 10 years in the top flight. Not bad.

_________________
There can be no true beauty without decay


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 133 posts ] 

It is currently Sat May 18, 2013 10:11 am

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: plymouth wanderer and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group