While not wanting to create a nanny site in any way, there have been concerns about some of the images that have been appearing on the forum as of late.

The concerns are not based around lack of taste, but the effect it is having on members visiting the site while at work. I am of course talking about pictures of half naked woman, which while being pleasant to the eye in most cases, may not be to the boss.

I'm sure you remember us having this problem not so long ago, which resulted in Keveh putting in the Avatar/sig on/off button. The problem here is that when the picture is posted on a thread, there is nothing we can do for certain members not wanting it to pop up on their work PC.

We are not saying these pictures, or any pictures short of naked woman or (in the ladies case) men, or porn pictures should not grace the boards of T-W, but that you respectfully do so with the correct warning, with a link attached, or in a clearly titled thread as Commie has done.

We ask this so that members can feel free to visit the site during working hours without the fear of someone behind them shouting "WAAAHEEEYYY!!!! Pete's looking at porn!!"

We also ask that you take into consideration that members visit the site while there wives and children are in the same room, which could result in a very uncomfortable situation.

So to summarise, we ask that:

1. If the pic you wish to post is not on a clearly titled thread 'Semi naked woman' etc, that you post a link rather then a picture with the sign attached.

2. If you are posting in a clearly titled and relative thread, that you take into consideration that naked pictures and porn will not be allowed, and will be removed immediately, followed by disaplinary action being taken.

As far as showing pictures of injuries is concerned, we simply asked that you use your own discretion in the matter, and that you take into consideration that members visit the site at home, with their families present. A good idea would be to first post a warning about what the image contains, followed by scrolling down that post a good page length before posting the picture.


Thanks for your understanding in this matter.


Site Admin

Rumbled, damn, there goes the job!

... on a vaguely related point, can I recommend AdBlock for Firefox to people. Designed to block out adverts, it can be used to easily control what images are visible become visible to you when using the web (not that I'm suggesting it's the solution to this matter, just that it's useful for similar filtering of images).

Image of the day on the home page is much better in fact anything would have been better, but which former manager are you on about?

As if I did not know

'kinnel man! Let it go!

This is a feedback page crazy - keep your nose out.

Oh dear. Get out of bed on the wrong side this morning did we?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMbYGF9R7tw

this really does have to find its way onto the front page

fat bastard

Super shoot??

Come on lads, let's get behind our Captain and support him by showing his goal from yesterday, not the miss, that's a bit negative.

It was a good goal

shitter miss

Think P.M.A, laddie

I read the anti Nolan comments with interest. I do believe that Nolan will come good again, sooner rather than later. At that point it will be interesting how some perceptions and preconceptions may change.

I'm thinking, "nonce"

Hans up who can't have kids