It is currently Sun May 26, 2013 12:25 am


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 145 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Matt Mills
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:34 pm 
Icon
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:13 am

Posts: 5269

Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)

BL3 wrote:
Leicester wrote:
I hope for your sake that he can refind his Reading form.

But I really think we've pulled a fast one on you.

Good luck for the season, here's to us sharing the two automatic promotion spots come May :pissed:


He's on loan isn't he? So if he's as inept as you say, he'll be re-joining you soon enough.

As for Leicester, is it just me who's wondering why the f**k you're favourites for promotion?


I dont know...BEN's reporting a permanent three year deal.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Mills
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:37 pm 
Immortal
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Posts: 19115

Would agree there's no guarantee that wage bill = success. There is however one hell of a correlation between success and wage-bill. :-)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Mills
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:01 pm 
Dedicated

Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 4:44 pm

Posts: 1151

Location: Northern Ireland

Worthy4England wrote:
Would agree there's no guarantee that wage bill = success. There is however one hell of a correlation between success and wage-bill. :-)


Man City and Real Madrid, anyone get figures for there wage bill ? This will be interesting


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Mills
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:07 pm 
Immortal
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Posts: 19307

http://www.bwfc.co.uk/page/General/0,,1 ... 24,00.html

Signed, and it's permanent on a three year deal. 2M fee apparently though officially 'undisclosed' as ever nowadays!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Mills
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:11 pm 
Dedicated
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 5:17 pm

Posts: 1241

Location: Leeds

ohjimmyjimmy wrote:
BL3 wrote:
Leicester wrote:
I hope for your sake that he can refind his Reading form.

But I really think we've pulled a fast one on you.

Good luck for the season, here's to us sharing the two automatic promotion spots come May :pissed:


He's on loan isn't he? So if he's as inept as you say, he'll be re-joining you soon enough.

As for Leicester, is it just me who's wondering why the f**k you're favourites for promotion?


I dont know...BEN's reporting a permanent three year deal.


Didn't the whole saga hit a snag sometime last week? Probably something to do with us wanting a loan/leicester wanting a permanent deal. Like few have said I imagine it's a compromise at a million now and another load next year but football finances are really not my forte, tbh I don't have a feckin clue about em.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Mills
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:14 pm 
Immortal
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Posts: 19115

Relentless09 wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:
Would agree there's no guarantee that wage bill = success. There is however one hell of a correlation between success and wage-bill. :-)


Man City and Real Madrid, anyone get figures for there wage bill ? This will be interesting


Probably in here somewhere...

http://www.deloitte.com/view/en_GB/uk/i ... /index.htm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Mills
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:18 pm 
Icon
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:13 am

Posts: 5269

Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)

wanderers_on_tour wrote:
ohjimmyjimmy wrote:
BL3 wrote:
Leicester wrote:
I hope for your sake that he can refind his Reading form.

But I really think we've pulled a fast one on you.

Good luck for the season, here's to us sharing the two automatic promotion spots come May :pissed:


He's on loan isn't he? So if he's as inept as you say, he'll be re-joining you soon enough.

As for Leicester, is it just me who's wondering why the f**k you're favourites for promotion?


I dont know...BEN's reporting a permanent three year deal.


Didn't the whole saga hit a snag sometime last week? Probably something to do with us wanting a loan/leicester wanting a permanent deal. Like few have said I imagine it's a compromise at a million now and another load next year but football finances are really not my forte, tbh I don't have a feckin clue about em.


It's confirmed.
Permanent.
Done deal.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Mills
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:18 pm 
Icon
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:13 am

Posts: 5269

Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)

http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/sport/wanderers/wanderersnews/9797440.Wanderers_land_Leicester_defender_Mills/

Quote:
Wanderers land Leicester defender Mills

1:00pm Wednesday 4th July 2012 in Latest By Marc Iles

WANDERERS have confirmed the signing of Leicester City defender Matt Mills.

The Whites have not divulged the fee paid for the 25-year-old centre-half but it is understood to be around £2million.

A season-long loan had been agreed between the two clubs before the deal hit a snag just over a week ago. After further talks, the transfer has now been made a permanent one, with the former Reading and Doncaster man signing a three-year contract.

Mills was signed by Sven-Goran Eriksson from Reading last season in a deal that could have eventually been worth £5m. But after the former England boss left the King Power Stadium Mills quickly found himself out in the cold under Nigel Pearson.




He did not play for the Foxes during the last three months of last season and was ordered to train with the reserves. But Mills – who helped Reading into the play-off finals the season before last - is due to start a new chapter in his career by joining his new team-mates at Euxton tomorrow.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Mills
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:22 pm 
Immortal
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 9:49 am

Posts: 12090

Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England

New 'on field' Captain ??

Surely to God (S)KD can't be a regular 90min man next year ??

_________________
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.

"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Mills
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:27 pm 
Immortal
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm

Posts: 11197

Location: Leeds

Aye - though I believe one mistake Leicester made was making him captain straight away and he got a bit big for his boots. I'd give it Ricketts on that basis...be nice to have a few leaders.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Mills
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:29 pm 
Hopeful

Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 7:57 pm

Posts: 17

Good luck to ya!

That's for taking him though :P


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Mills
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:29 pm 
Hopeful

Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 7:57 pm

Posts: 17

Worthy4England wrote:
Would agree there's no guarantee that wage bill = success. There is however one hell of a correlation between success and wage-bill. :-)



Not in this league there isn't.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Mills
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 2:45 pm 
Passionate
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:49 pm

Posts: 3713

Location: Home. Home, again. I like to be here when I can.

Leicester wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:
Would agree there's no guarantee that wage bill = success. There is however one hell of a correlation between success and wage-bill. :-)



Not in this league there isn't.


No correlation? I'd be very surprised at that. I have no idea of the figures, and am too apathetic to check, but surely West Ham would have had one of the higher wage bills of the league last year? And probably Reading.

QPR, certainly, the year before.

It isn't a guarantee of success, but spending a lot of money certainly helps. Which is why, as I've said over and over, football is completely pointless, and we may as well call it all off and just let each club count out their wads of cash. Award the trophies to those with the biggest pile. That way we can all stop wasting our time and so something enjoyable and useful instead.

_________________
"Yes, I received your letter yesterday, about the time the doorknob broke,
When you asked how I was doing, was that some kind of joke?".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Mills
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:14 pm 
Reliable

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 1:15 pm

Posts: 935

Prufrock wrote:
Coz they spent about a trillion quid last year.


...and still didn't even make the play-offs despite being favourites last season as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Mills
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:16 pm 
Reliable

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 1:15 pm

Posts: 935

Leicester wrote:
And no, we're not favourites for promotion.


According to the bookies you are:

http://www.oddschecker.com/football/eng ... hip/winner


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Mills
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 5:49 pm 
Dedicated

Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 6:43 pm

Posts: 1573

Location: midlands

Leicester wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:
Would agree there's no guarantee that wage bill = success. There is however one hell of a correlation between success and wage-bill. :-)



Not in this league there isn't.



Certainly not when Swansea were in it.

Their wage bill was a fraction of many others

_________________
Remember. There is a not a regular at a Top 10 club who would come to us - we can't afford them.
But when we buy players with potential, little PL experience or out of favour you criticise.
Now who should we buy??????


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Mills
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 5:56 pm 
Hopeful

Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 7:57 pm

Posts: 17

If you think that there is a correlation between success and wage in this league then you're mistaken.

Just ask Hull, Ipswich, Middlesborough, QPR (took them 3 years to go up), West Ham (really struggled, should have walked the league, still successful I know but considering who got there ahead of them), Leicester and Forest.

And they are in the last 2/3 seasons alone.


Trust me, the correlation is between players who work hard for the side and who has a really good manager.

Just ask QPR, Swansea, Norwich, Southampton, Reading and Blackpool.


Last edited by Leicester on Wed Jul 04, 2012 5:59 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Mills
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 5:56 pm 
Hopeful

Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 7:57 pm

Posts: 17

BL3 wrote:
Prufrock wrote:
Coz they spent about a trillion quid last year.


...and still didn't even make the play-offs despite being favourites last season as well.



What's with the constant digs?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Mills
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 6:09 pm 
Reliable

Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 11:16 am

Posts: 512

Leicester wrote:
BL3 wrote:
Prufrock wrote:
Coz they spent about a trillion quid last year.


...and still didn't even make the play-offs despite being favourites last season as well.



What's with the constant digs?


Anyway, isn't he a ginger? Is there any correlation between hair colour and success in gaining promotion? Come you stattos, do your worst.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Mills
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 6:22 pm 
Immortal
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Posts: 19115

Leicester wrote:
If you think that there is a correlation between success and wage in this league then you're mistaken.

Just ask Hull, Ipswich, Middlesborough, QPR (took them 3 years to go up), West Ham (really struggled, should have walked the league, still successful I know but considering who got there ahead of them), Leicester and Forest.

And they are in the last 2/3 seasons alone.


Trust me, the correlation is between players who work hard for the side and who has a really good manager.

Just ask QPR, Swansea, Norwich, Southampton, Reading and Blackpool.


There will always be the odd outliers. QPR's wages bill the season before last was about the same as ours.

You've had West Ham twice, Sunderland twice, Newcastle, West Brom twice, Wolves, QPR, Stoke and Wiggin - all of whom spent a few bob on the way.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 145 posts ] 

It is currently Sun May 26, 2013 12:25 am

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group