It is currently Sun May 19, 2013 9:36 am


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 524 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 11:22 am 
Immortal
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 9:49 am

Posts: 11994

Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England

lovethesmellofnapalm wrote:
please!!!!
j'accuse!
OK, let's start a campaign ... Jack Hughes for our next manager.

_________________
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.

"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 11:38 am 
Immortal
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Posts: 19073

Ianmooreslovechild wrote:
Hoboh wrote:
Ianmooreslovechild wrote:
Well we could have put the assistant in charge I guess.It's too late for coyle out now.lets see what happens after the next 4 games but even so he's here till the summer.Can only get behind the team regardless.There's nothing else to do.


I honestly think I dislike Coyle just as much as Megson now, both are imho having the same effect of ruining BWFC only Coyle may take it one degree worse! If we drop Gartside should go too!


I totally understand that but what the feck we're stuck with this until the summer. I thought coyle tried to do things right yesterday except for playing pratley in a position were Tuncay might have been more effective. There' sno point harking back to Big Sam,he left as he knew he'd taken the club as far as he could and wanted a new challenge. Megson was a tosser who did a competent job,coyle is a nice guy doing the reverse. As for Gartside hasnt he been chairman through the most successful period in the clubs recent history? The appointments made since Allardyce all looked reasonable at the time including sammy Lee.Coyle looked like a stroke of genius for almost a year. I wouldnt be calling for gartside's head if we go down.We may as has been said before have to cut our cloth and at best accept that we are a yoyo sized team. It's all good and well pointing at Norwich and Swansea yes they have excellent managers and momentum but those managers will move on and the momentum will slow and eventually they will be were we are. It's the way it is for clubs of our size. Brief periods in the sun and longer periods in the shade.We've been spoiled by bucking the trend for a longer period than normal.

The type of players allardyce built our team on head for the USA and middle east these days. If he'd stayed he'd at best have achieved what he did at Blackburn. As it was the last 6 months he was here we were going backwards and less and less off his signings were working out.


I don't agree with the "clubs of our size" part, whilst we still have a wage bill that's top tier, lower to mid-table. We generally finish in a position commensurate with our spending on wages. Allardyce managed to buck the trend, Megson probably punched our spending "weight". Coyle is underperforming for a Club of our spending size.

I wouldn't get shut of Gartside either, even though I think Coyle should have gone at the end of November.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 11:57 am 
Reliable
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 8:22 pm

Posts: 944

We looked pretty comfortable in the first half, we offered nothing in attack but I thought we handled them pretty well in defence.... then the flood gates opened.

I think the most glaringly obvious thing to everyone yesterday was that we lacked creativity in midfield because Pratley is just a useless sack of garbage. Then again, there's not much Coyle could really do, Holden and Davies who both play that position well both out injured, then again I would have rather stuck Tuncay in there and Eagles on the pitch rather than play Pratley.

I was sat in the Chelsea corporate end for this one, luckily they found my rants and whines at Pratley and Tuncay very amusing.

I'll end on a good note, Tim Ream looks a solid signing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 12:00 pm 
Dedicated

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:00 am

Posts: 1695

Worthy4England wrote:
Ianmooreslovechild wrote:
Hoboh wrote:
Ianmooreslovechild wrote:
Well we could have put the assistant in charge I guess.It's too late for coyle out now.lets see what happens after the next 4 games but even so he's here till the summer.Can only get behind the team regardless.There's nothing else to do.


I honestly think I dislike Coyle just as much as Megson now, both are imho having the same effect of ruining BWFC only Coyle may take it one degree worse! If we drop Gartside should go too!


I totally understand that but what the feck we're stuck with this until the summer. I thought coyle tried to do things right yesterday except for playing pratley in a position were Tuncay might have been more effective. There' sno point harking back to Big Sam,he left as he knew he'd taken the club as far as he could and wanted a new challenge. Megson was a tosser who did a competent job,coyle is a nice guy doing the reverse. As for Gartside hasnt he been chairman through the most successful period in the clubs recent history? The appointments made since Allardyce all looked reasonable at the time including sammy Lee.Coyle looked like a stroke of genius for almost a year. I wouldnt be calling for gartside's head if we go down.We may as has been said before have to cut our cloth and at best accept that we are a yoyo sized team. It's all good and well pointing at Norwich and Swansea yes they have excellent managers and momentum but those managers will move on and the momentum will slow and eventually they will be were we are. It's the way it is for clubs of our size. Brief periods in the sun and longer periods in the shade.We've been spoiled by bucking the trend for a longer period than normal.

The type of players allardyce built our team on head for the USA and middle east these days. If he'd stayed he'd at best have achieved what he did at Blackburn. As it was the last 6 months he was here we were going backwards and less and less off his signings were working out.


I don't agree with the "clubs of our size" part, whilst we still have a wage bill that's top tier, lower to mid-table. We generally finish in a position commensurate with our spending on wages. Allardyce managed to buck the trend, Megson probably punched our spending "weight". Coyle is underperforming for a Club of our spending size.

I wouldn't get shut of Gartside either, even though I think Coyle should have gone at the end of November.


The clubs of our size point is not just about what we have/are spending but also what we should/can spend.We have been overspending hence the debt which has to be addressed. It may well be that coyle is trying to deal with this hence the substandard signings. We are also tied to carrying a number of big earners to the end of the season. We have debts becauese we have been living beyond our means,addressing that debt means a lower standard of living,not addressing it means ultimately a visit from the bailifs.
You are right that if coyle was to go it should have been november. We'll know in four games time whether we have a chance of staying up. Should we dispense with Coyle in the summer(which I'm sure most people here believe we should) it will be interesting to see who is interested in coming in. The remit they have will be the same as coyle's work to a budget and sign players we may be able to sell on. What's dario Gradi up to these days? :grin:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 12:20 pm 
Immortal
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Posts: 19073

Ianmooreslovechild wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:
Ianmooreslovechild wrote:
Hoboh wrote:
Ianmooreslovechild wrote:
Well we could have put the assistant in charge I guess.It's too late for coyle out now.lets see what happens after the next 4 games but even so he's here till the summer.Can only get behind the team regardless.There's nothing else to do.


I honestly think I dislike Coyle just as much as Megson now, both are imho having the same effect of ruining BWFC only Coyle may take it one degree worse! If we drop Gartside should go too!


I totally understand that but what the feck we're stuck with this until the summer. I thought coyle tried to do things right yesterday except for playing pratley in a position were Tuncay might have been more effective. There' sno point harking back to Big Sam,he left as he knew he'd taken the club as far as he could and wanted a new challenge. Megson was a tosser who did a competent job,coyle is a nice guy doing the reverse. As for Gartside hasnt he been chairman through the most successful period in the clubs recent history? The appointments made since Allardyce all looked reasonable at the time including sammy Lee.Coyle looked like a stroke of genius for almost a year. I wouldnt be calling for gartside's head if we go down.We may as has been said before have to cut our cloth and at best accept that we are a yoyo sized team. It's all good and well pointing at Norwich and Swansea yes they have excellent managers and momentum but those managers will move on and the momentum will slow and eventually they will be were we are. It's the way it is for clubs of our size. Brief periods in the sun and longer periods in the shade.We've been spoiled by bucking the trend for a longer period than normal.

The type of players allardyce built our team on head for the USA and middle east these days. If he'd stayed he'd at best have achieved what he did at Blackburn. As it was the last 6 months he was here we were going backwards and less and less off his signings were working out.


I don't agree with the "clubs of our size" part, whilst we still have a wage bill that's top tier, lower to mid-table. We generally finish in a position commensurate with our spending on wages. Allardyce managed to buck the trend, Megson probably punched our spending "weight". Coyle is underperforming for a Club of our spending size.

I wouldn't get shut of Gartside either, even though I think Coyle should have gone at the end of November.


The clubs of our size point is not just about what we have/are spending but also what we should/can spend.We have been overspending hence the debt which has to be addressed. It may well be that coyle is trying to deal with this hence the substandard signings. We are also tied to carrying a number of big earners to the end of the season. We have debts becauese we have been living beyond our means,addressing that debt means a lower standard of living,not addressing it means ultimately a visit from the bailifs.
You are right that if coyle was to go it should have been november. We'll know in four games time whether we have a chance of staying up. Should we dispense with Coyle in the summer(which I'm sure most people here believe we should) it will be interesting to see who is interested in coming in. The remit they have will be the same as coyle's work to a budget and sign players we may be able to sell on. What's dario Gradi up to these days? :grin:


I have no doubt that OC has cut the wage bill. I similarly have no doubt that it's still bigger than at least three teams in the Prem. In terms of his substandard signings, he's had money. Not as much as Megson had, but still reasonable and comparable to quite a few of the other teams in the division, who I listed on a previous post. Presumably Eddie and Phil believed that investment to be sustainable. Part of our ability to punch above our weight is tv revenues, most of which we'll lose when we go down, so Eddie and whoever is Manager will need to make further cuts etc.

Which ever way I look at this, and agreed OC is making cuts (whereas Megson blatantly wasn't), Coyle STILL has more resources than more than 3 teams in the Division.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 12:31 pm 
Dedicated

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:00 am

Posts: 1695

I'm sure you are right but he also lost two key players for the season unexpectedly and as it was injuries there was no money to replace them. If you factor in the value of the missing players against the expenditure on transfers it's quite a deficit.This is were size matters. Small squad and not enough funds to invest in genuine replacements for key players when they are injured.I still maintain that his summer signings were intended to be squad players/impact players. The core of the intended team would have included CYL and holden,from mid autumn.Could have made a huge difference.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 12:39 pm 
Immortal
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Posts: 19073

Ianmooreslovechild wrote:
I'm sure you are right but he also lost two key players for the season unexpectedly and as it was injuries there was no money to replace them. If you factor in the value of the missing players against the expenditure on transfers it's quite a deficit.This is were size matters. Small squad and not enough funds to invest in genuine replacements for key players when they are injured.I still maintain that his summer signings were intended to be squad players/impact players. The core of the intended team would have included CYL and holden,from mid autumn.Could have made a huge difference.


The two players we lost, cost less than he's just spent on marvellous Marvin. Who do we think he signed in Jan to replace these two absolutely critical players? You could argue Ryo on loan for CYL, Who did he get to replace Holden? No one....yet he spent 3 mill on Horrell..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 1:30 pm 
Immortal
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Posts: 19231

The majority of the premiership is in debt. Just look at Man Utd as an example.

I think the last analysis showed we were around 13th in the spending and wages table. I can't imagine that has changed much given the three promoted sides. 2 of whom will be below us.

We are underperforming and yes we've been unlucky with injuries but so are a lot of managers. Shit happens. Sean Davis had a decent injury record before he came here. Megson was unlucky that the guy he picked to solve our midfield issues was injured before he started.

We still have enough in our squad now to be safe. That's the bottom line.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:38 pm 
Dedicated
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:36 am

Posts: 1380

Worthy4England wrote:
Ianmooreslovechild wrote:
I'm sure you are right but he also lost two key players for the season unexpectedly and as it was injuries there was no money to replace them. If you factor in the value of the missing players against the expenditure on transfers it's quite a deficit.This is were size matters. Small squad and not enough funds to invest in genuine replacements for key players when they are injured.I still maintain that his summer signings were intended to be squad players/impact players. The core of the intended team would have included CYL and holden,from mid autumn.Could have made a huge difference.


The two players we lost, cost less than he's just spent on marvellous Marvin. Who do we think he signed in Jan to replace these two absolutely critical players? You could argue Ryo on loan for CYL, Who did he get to replace Holden? No one....yet he spent 3 mill on Horrell..


Bingo!

So, if we want to play 4-4-2 we need a midfield that can play it. If we don't have that personnel we put the players out in a formation that can see us have a good go at getting something out of a game.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 3:53 pm 
Dedicated

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:00 am

Posts: 1695

Armchair Wanderer wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:
Ianmooreslovechild wrote:
I'm sure you are right but he also lost two key players for the season unexpectedly and as it was injuries there was no money to replace them. If you factor in the value of the missing players against the expenditure on transfers it's quite a deficit.This is were size matters. Small squad and not enough funds to invest in genuine replacements for key players when they are injured.I still maintain that his summer signings were intended to be squad players/impact players. The core of the intended team would have included CYL and holden,from mid autumn.Could have made a huge difference.


The two players we lost, cost less than he's just spent on marvellous Marvin. Who do we think he signed in Jan to replace these two absolutely critical players? You could argue Ryo on loan for CYL, Who did he get to replace Holden? No one....yet he spent 3 mill on Horrell..


Bingo!

So, if we want to play 4-4-2 we need a midfield that can play it. If we don't have that personnel we put the players out in a formation that can see us have a good go at getting something out of a game.


Would make sense and finally appears to be what he is trying to do.Only wasted a year before he realised.NRC perhaps has the defensive half of Holden's game but has nothing like the range or ability on the ball so in a 442 with Moo and NRC there is no creativity leaving us reliant on our miss more than hit wide players to create something.
Worthy ,I imagine had their been an affordable Holden like player available we'd have gone for it.getting someone with his qualities on a free was an incredible fluke,had coyle managed to do it twice I'd be asking him for lottery ticket recommendations.Could have asked spurs to loan us Parker but I'm guessing they'd have said no.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:08 pm 
Icon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:18 pm

Posts: 5213

Location: Mid Sussex

norm the jedi wrote:
Gooner Girl wrote:

NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(and i am always so nice about Bolton!)


That'll learn you - Loved them in the 90's still think Dennis was best player i ever saw in the flesh...

but a combination of EMIRATES, your myopic manager and Alan DAVIS and his celebrity Gooner chums..
Have laterly been more chucklesome..

feck me I need some light relief.. and anyway Spurs are very good..
What will you spend the Van Persie transfer cash on?


No they're not! :D you def. need to change your sig after today's performance!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:51 pm 
Passionate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:11 pm

Posts: 2485

Location: Near a Shandy

Gooner Girl wrote:
norm the jedi wrote:
Gooner Girl wrote:

NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(and i am always so nice about Bolton!)


That'll learn you - Loved them in the 90's still think Dennis was best player i ever saw in the flesh...

but a combination of EMIRATES, your myopic manager and Alan DAVIS and his celebrity Gooner chums..
Have laterly been more chucklesome..

feck me I need some light relief.. and anyway Spurs are very good..
What will you spend the Van Persie transfer cash on?


No they're not! :D you def. need to change your sig after today's performance!


Ah .. remember how you laughed when all Spurs fans could look forward too every season was beating Arsenal... i bet there'll be a dvd of today in the Emirates shop...
There's that circle of life again... it's a good feeling beating a big team isn't it.

_________________
At least we can still laugh at Arsenal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:56 pm 
Icon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:18 pm

Posts: 5213

Location: Mid Sussex

It's a good feeling beating spurs, yes, so even your teasing can't get me down tonight. Certainly won't be a DVD bought out though, we are not as sad as Tottenham hotspur who even make commemorative plates when they beat us - it happens so rarely.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:06 pm 
Passionate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:11 pm

Posts: 2485

Location: Near a Shandy

Gooner Girl wrote:
It's a good feeling beating spurs, yes, so even your teasing can't get me down tonight. Certainly won't be a DVD bought out though, we are not as sad as Tottenham hotspur who even make commemorative plates when they beat us - it happens so rarely.


So what you doing with your time now the season is over :D

_________________
At least we can still laugh at Arsenal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:10 pm 
Icon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:18 pm

Posts: 5213

Location: Mid Sussex

norm the jedi wrote:
Gooner Girl wrote:
It's a good feeling beating spurs, yes, so even your teasing can't get me down tonight. Certainly won't be a DVD bought out though, we are not as sad as Tottenham hotspur who even make commemorative plates when they beat us - it happens so rarely.


So what you doing with your time now the season is over :D


Oh mostly watching you scrap in the relegation battle - are you enjoying it? ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:27 pm 
Passionate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:11 pm

Posts: 2485

Location: Near a Shandy

Gooner Girl wrote:
norm the jedi wrote:
Gooner Girl wrote:
It's a good feeling beating spurs, yes, so even your teasing can't get me down tonight. Certainly won't be a DVD bought out though, we are not as sad as Tottenham hotspur who even make commemorative plates when they beat us - it happens so rarely.


So what you doing with your time now the season is over :D


Oh mostly watching you scrap in the relegation battle - are you enjoying it? ;)


There's a battle? When did that start? Even our shirts double as white flags..
Handy for second half capitulation at present.....
....

_________________
At least we can still laugh at Arsenal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 11:13 pm 
Immortal
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am

Posts: 26774

Location: In my armchair

Gooner Girl wrote:
norm the jedi wrote:
Gooner Girl wrote:
It's a good feeling beating spurs, yes, so even your teasing can't get me down tonight. Certainly won't be a DVD bought out though, we are not as sad as Tottenham hotspur who even make commemorative plates when they beat us - it happens so rarely.


So what you doing with your time now the season is over :D


Oh mostly watching you scrap in the relegation battle - are you enjoying it? ;)


:(

_________________
664 - the neighbour of the beast....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 11:40 pm 
Icon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:18 pm

Posts: 5213

Location: Mid Sussex

thebish wrote:
Gooner Girl wrote:
norm the jedi wrote:
Gooner Girl wrote:
It's a good feeling beating spurs, yes, so even your teasing can't get me down tonight. Certainly won't be a DVD bought out though, we are not as sad as Tottenham hotspur who even make commemorative plates when they beat us - it happens so rarely.


So what you doing with your time now the season is over :D


Oh mostly watching you scrap in the relegation battle - are you enjoying it? ;)


:(


Ahh Bish, just getting my own back on cheeky Norm with a return in banter. I don't want you relegated, you know that! I quite like Bolton!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 11:51 pm 
Immortal

Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Posts: 10887

Location: Bolton

Streak?

_________________
"We're the only show in town. Government's a fxck up, half the Civil Service is out-to-lunch. The Foreign Office is as much use as a wet dream, the country's stony-broke and the bankers are taking our money and giving us the finger."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Battle of Stamford Bridge
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 11:54 pm 
Icon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:18 pm

Posts: 5213

Location: Mid Sussex

Hoboh wrote:
Streak?


Eh?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 524 posts ] 

It is currently Sun May 19, 2013 9:36 am

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: NWhiteley and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group